David Kirby


I Just Didn’t Want to Listen to the Upchucks


I had a friend in college who was a brilliant artist,
just transcendent, but she decided to major in biology, 
and when I asked her why, she said, “I want people 
to think I’m smart,” and now she’s got this dead-end 
lab job that she hates. She was like the W. H. Auden
who said, “When I find myself in the company
of scientists, I feel like a shabby curate who has strayed 
by mistake into a drawing room full of dukes.” Ha, ha! 
No need to feel that way, W. H.! People who are 
different just don’t understand shit the way you do, 
which is something we scientists call neurodiversity. 
Too, statistician George Box says, “All models are 
wrong, but some models are useful.” Another way 
to put it is to say that everything is wrong, especially
if you insist on it being right all the time. For example,
say your roommate is dating this guy, but they break up,
and two months later you’re at a party, and you see 
someone you think is your roomie’s ex but who 
turns out to be his twin, and you hit it off with him, 
which makes sense because you feel as though 
you know him already, so you take him home 
and sneak him in and have whoopy-do sex and wake up 
the next day and wonder how you’re going to keep 
your roommate from seeing him or if you even have to, 
because he’s not really her ex-boyfriend, but on 
the other hand he kind of halfway is, not to mention
the fact that even after you’ve explained things,
she’ll still have hated you so much during 
the two minutes that she thought he was her ex 
that she may never be able to be friends with you 
again or at least the way she was before. If you
get all worked up over whether or not you’re
doing things the right way, you’ll never do
anything. Kazuo Ishiguro says, “You can 
think of me like an early aviator before airplanes 
were properly invented. I’m building some sort 
of flying machine in my back garden. I just 
need it to fly. And you know how odd some 
of those early flying machines looked? Well, 
my novels are a bit like that. I put them together 
out of anything I can think of according to 
my thinking to make the thing fly.” Now there’s
a shovelful of practical and down-to-earth advice 
for you. Preach, son! As Aaron Neville says, 
tell it like it is. Don’t think, think, think, sheeple—
do, do, do! Think too much and you’ll be like 
those conspiracy theorists who look at
the statue of Lincoln at the Lincoln Memorial 
and say they see the profile of Jefferson Davis
in the locks of the president’s hair despite
the National Parks Service’s insistence that
those are just wayward strands. Really, there’s no
understanding anything—why, just this morning 
I was stopped at a light on Railroad Avenue 
when a young woman in the lane next to me 
opened her car door and upchucked violently. 
Abba's "Dancing Queen" was on the radio, so 
I cranked up the volume, at which point 
the young miss shouted something I couldn't hear 
and gave me the finger. Obviously she thought
I was making fun of her, but I wasn't, I just didn't 
want to listen to the upchucks. Or say you pop 
your vitamins into your mouth, but you think 
maybe you dropped one, so you spit them into 
your hand to make sure, and they’re all there, 
so you pop your vitamins into your mouth again,
but you drop one. Yet are not these little contretemps
the micro-screwups that create life’s rich tapestry? 
To think otherwise is to think that life is a novel. 
Life is not a novel. It’s a dictionary. As a boy, 
Robert Pinsky loved reading dictionaries. 
“Read as much as you want,” says Pinsky, 
“this word reminds you of that word, 
you could just wander. It didn’t matter 
if you lost your place. It wasn’t tyrannical
like a story.” See? Life’s not a novel, 
it’s a dictionary, it’s just full of stuff.


Good Night, Barbara Strawitz

Bobby Williams writes to tell me of the death
of Miss Strawitz, our high-school chemistry teacher,
which is when I learn that her given name was “Barbara.” 
In those days, we didn’t think of our teachers as having 
a name other than the last: Mrs. LeBlanc, Mr. Teague, 

Mr. Daigle, Miss Strawitz. If you’d asked us, we would 
have guessed that when he was a toddler, Mr. Daigle’s mom 
called Mr. Daigle “Mr. Daigle.” I write Bobby back to say,
“I loved Barbara Strawitz. I never did quite grasp 
what a valence was, but that's my shortcoming, not hers. 

She was open-hearted, happy, whip-smart, and devoted 
to her students. It's good to be able to think about her again,”
to which Bobby replies, “David, you must have been out sick
when she taught us what a valence was. A carbon atom 
has 6 electrons with an electron shell configuration of 1s, 

2s and 2p (squared), meaning carbon has a valence of 4 
since 4 electrons can be accepted to fill the 2p orbital—
actually pretty simple when you stop to think about it.” 
Right. For Bobby Williams. What’s your go-to metaphor 
for death? Kick the bucket, buy the farm, cash in,

assume room temperature? Old-school soul singers 
used to refer to “a backover flip,” as in “you thrill me so
I turned a backover flip,” though they weren’t talking about
death so much as a certain kind of love, that which 
the French characterized as un coup de foudre or thunderclap: 

I see you or you see me and, pow—somebody just got zapped! 
Somebody did a backover flip, or maybe both of us did. 
That’s not the same as death, but maybe it is, since
philosophers say that sex and death amount to the same thing,
that is, a momentary dissolution of the self, though

in the case of death, that moment lasts a whole lot longer
than the uh-uh-UNHH! of wall-socket sex, as satisfying as that is.
Maybe what death and sex have in common is the experience
of being overwhelmed, of using your body as a means
to leave your body and forget all earthly woes. Try this:

put on a wool cap and some sunglasses and send a picture
of yourself to your beloved, who’ll reply, “You look like
the I-5 Killer!” to which you say, “C’mere and I’ll murder you”
and see if they don’t say, “On my way!” That night I dream 
I’m making out with Barbara Strawitz, but it’s okay: 

in my dream I’m my age now and not a pimply teenager,
and she’s the age she was then, so we’re the same age, 
give or take. That’s the thing about death. It’s not a negative.
Death contains everything that came before it: nostalgia, 
sorrow, longing, dreams, despair, hope, joy, chemistry lessons. 

Sometimes death’s darkest moments even mix with laughter 
the way a carbon atom takes on electrons. Comic Rob Delaney 
recounts how, when his two-year-old son died of brain cancer, 
his father-in-law wept and said, “I wish it were me instead 
of Henry,” and Rob Delaney said, “We do too, Richard.”


The Voynich Manuscript


is known otherwise as the world’s most mysterious book as it is 
not only written in an indecipherable language but has also resisted
scholars’ attempts to identify even its date and place of origin. 
But I like mysteries, don’t you? Even the little ones, like why
would the pharmacy on my corner have a sign in its window
saying “We Dispense with Accuracy” unless they’re trying to 
be funny? Thank god we know what we’re doing most of the time!

Take Giuseppe Verdi. Boy, did Giuseppe Verdi ever know what 
he was doing most of the time. As he was putting the final touches 
on Rigoletto, he realized that “La Donna è Mobile” was not just 
any old aria, that anyone who heard it in the concert hall 
would be whistling it in the street the next day, so he kept it 
under wraps until his opera’s premiere, which is when 
he gave the song to the orchestra and the tenor who’d sing it 

just hours before the curtain went up. “La Donna è Mobile” 
is a simple tune, it’s short and recognizable, and people did 
whistle it in the street the next day and have continued to whistle it ever since,
not because they were at the 1851 premiere of Rigoletto
or one of the thousands of iterations that have taken place 
since but because they’ve heard one or more of the tens of thousands 
of uses of “La Donna è Mobile” in present-day ads and movies.

No such luck with the Voynich Manuscript: nobody talks 
about it at all because no one can read it and or even 
figure out where it came from and when. Best guesses suggest it was written
somewhere in what is now Central Europe in either 
the 15th or 16th century and proceeded to appear 
and then disappear into, for example, the library of Holy Roman Emperor
Rudolf II and then pop up again at a secret sale of books in 1903

by the Society of Jesus in Rome and, after that, in the shop
of rare books dealer Wilfrid Voynich, whence its name.
I’m glad we can’t read it. If we could, the Voynich Manuscript
would almost certainly disappoint, seeing as how it is
likely to offer either that be-moderate-in-all-things philosophy
that the ancients served up by the truckload to their rulers
in order to insure good governance or else a Machiavellian

cocktail of cruelty, genocide, and advice on the most effective
techniques by which one might extract secrets from one’s 
enemies without actually killing them, also thought at the time 
to be a sure path toward good governance by many nations then
and even a few today. Also, what if the Voynich manuscript
turns out to be pure visual art rather than a book-book
like any other, if the peculiar markings on its every page 

are just that and not actual words with one-to-one 
corollaries in English such as l’amour for “love” 
and Unterseeboot for “submarine”? What if its author
just wanted make something, to be a presence, gin up
an eyepopper, spectacle, jimjam, hurlyburly, skillygalee,
gallimaufry, hullabaloo, wang-dang-doodle? In that
the unknown author would be a somewhat distant

if undeniable ancestor, if not in the biological sense
at least the artistic one, of the Shaggs, a three-sister
rock band so notable for their over-the-top ineptitude
that while one critic compared their melodic lines and structures
to the free jazz compositions of Ornette Coleman,
another described them as “sounding like
lobotomized Trapp Family singers.” Another critic still

said that while Dot and Betty Wiggin shredded
their out-of-tune pawn shop guitars in a way that both charmed
and unsettled, drummer Helen Wiggin was often
completely detached from what her sisters were playing.
Good for them, I say, and good for the person or persons
who wrote the Voynich Manuscript. Good for everyone
who ever lived, is living now, and will live who wants

to make their mark, do their thing, let their freak flag fly.
Nobody wants to be end up like Pancho Villa, 
who rose from humble beginnings to become governor of the state
of Chihuahua and then a leader of the Mexican Revolution
and who, at the end of his life, was ambushed and shot dead
by rivals, but not before saying to his companions, 
“Don’t let it end like this. Tell them I said something.”


Thinking About Jesus After Watching Richard Strauss’s Ariadne auf Naxos, During Which I Have a Drink and After Which I Consume an Entire Meal in the Company of Friends

Barbara and Sue and Fabio and I have front-row seats
for a production of Ariadne auf Naxos, which is just 
about the stupidest piece of nonsense I’ve ever seen 
in my entire life, meaning it’s excellent. What happens 
is that the richest man in Vienna hires two opera 

companies to stage their works, one serious and one 
comic, but decides at the last minute that both must run 
simultaneously so his guests can get on to the evening’s 
real draw, a fireworks display in the garden. At the interval
I step to the bar to get a drink and a sandwich but end up 

getting a drink as there are no sandwiches to be had, 
making me doubly glad I’d bought a two-hander earlier 
in the day at a little sandwich shop some blocks away, 
where I’d been in line behind a man who had the distinct 
appearance of a person you might expect to see elsewhere—

at a busy intersection, say, holding a cardboard sign saying 
WILL WORK FOR FOOD or squatting on the sidewalk 
with one saying HELP ME FEED MY DOG and a dog, 
since people who don’t give money to people will sometimes 
give money to dogs. Anyway, the line moves forward, 

and one by one each ravenous customer scampers away 
with his or her delicious sandwich, and when the man gets 
to the front of the line, he orders a herring and onion 
on ciabatta and then turns to me and says, “Buy me 
a sandwich?” What am I going to say? The counterman’s 

already making it. So I say, “Sure, I guess,” any resentment 
I feel at being hustled far outweighed by my admiration 
for his skill as a strategist, tactician, playmaker—I too 
was hungry, meaning I empathized, plus I already had 
my wallet out, and besides, if I hadn’t ponied up, 

the person behind me would have or the person after that. 
Another way to look at it is that my new friend was 
a behavioral scientist of sorts, much like Professor Logan Ury, 
who tells clients eager to find that perfect someone
to take to heart what behavioral scientists like herself 

and the gentleman in the sandwich shop call The Secretary 
Problem: if you want to hire a secretary and have 100 
candidates, how do you pick the right person? The optimal 
answer is that you should interview 37 candidates, 
decide on the one you like best to that point, then hire 

the next applicant who strikes you as superior to that standout, 
a version of which method was used earlier by German 
astronomer and mathematician Johannes Kepler, 
a key figure in the scientific revolution that took place 
in the seventeenth century and marked the emergence 

of modern science, though I am shoehorning him into 
this poem at this point not to celebrate his formulation
of the laws of planetary motion or his almost equally
important work in optics and geometry but to note that, 
after he lost his first wife to cholera, he decided to choose 

his next wife via a mathematical process very similar 
to that used by Dr. Ury’s clients, devoting two years 
of his life to interviewing and ranking 11 possible 
candidates and then making a calculated choice, 
even though, when he tried to go back and propose 

to the fourth person he interviewed, she had already 
moved on, whereupon he proposed to candidate number five 
and ended up happily married to her for many years.
In all fairness, though, I should note that you might do
just as well by following the example of stage director

Peter Brooks, who fell in love with the heroine of War 
and Peace
at the age of twelve and decided to marry 
someone named Natasha, which he did twenty-nine years 
later when he proposed to and won the hand 
of documentary filmmaker Natasha Parry, to whom 

he was happily married for many years, as in whatever. 
Anyway, nice work, Johannes Kepler! You knew how 
to read the room, size people up, take their pulse 
at least as much as American Bandstand host 
Dick Clark, aka America’s Oldest Teenager, who in fact 

invented the teenager or almost. It’s the 1950s, right? 
A decade that saw the birth of rocket science, the racial
integration of major league baseball, the GI bill of rights, 
the interstate highway system, Holiday Inn motels, 
and fast-food restaurants. Whew! The Corvette! Mad magazine! 

The Abby and Ann Landers advice columns, disposable diapers, 
the telephone answering machine! Now imagine all these 
images on a giant piece of butcher paper, through which 
bursts a couple of gangly kids, the girl in jeans and a tight sweater 
over a push-up bra (another Fifties innovation), the boy 

in biker boots and a leather jacket with a bulge in his pocket 
that might be a switchblade, though it’s probably just 
a comb—yes, ladies and gentlemen, it’s the Teenager, 
a new breed that has its own ideas, own money, 
own music. Before, teens were just miniature adults; 

when two college kids meet for lunch in J. D. Salinger’s 
story “Franny” (1955), they drink martinis, eat escargots, 
and talk about European literature, doing their best 
to imitate adult sophistication. To hell with that. 
The teenager was driven by something called 

rock ‘n’ roll, a type of music grown-ups feared because 
they could tell right off that it promoted the mixing 
of the races, featured “dirty” lyrics, and inspired unruly 
behavior, that as music it was just crap. Though he 
would later host Elvis on his television show, Frank Sinatra 

went on record as saying “rock ‘n’ roll smells phony 
and false. It is sung, played and written for the most part 
by cretinous goons.” The market for the new music 
was positively thrumming with energy, though, 
so Dick Clark found a way to sell it by hosting all 

the new groups on his TV show while harking back 
to the imitation-adult model and instituting a strict 
dress code for the enthusiastic boppers who appeared 
on screens all over America: no shorts, slacks, or tight 
sweaters for the girls, and neckties with either a sweater 

or jacket for the fellows. “Nobody dressed that way 
in real life,” said Dick Clark, “but it made the show 
acceptable to adults who were frightened by the teen-age 
world and its music,” meaning that while rock ‘n’ roll 
looked like rebellion to America’s parents and pastors 

and principals, overnight it become a business strategy 
that made billions as a simmering post-war capitalism 
began to roar. Anyway, back to Ariadne auf Naxos
When Ariadne, the tragic heroine, is abandoned 
by Theseus, she laments her lost love and yearns for death,

even though Zerbinetta, the comic heroine, insists that 
the best way to cure a broken heart is to find another love; 
conveniently, a stranger arrives, whom Ariadne assumes 
is the messenger of death, but in fact is Bacchus, 
who falls in love with Ariadne instantly. As the two lovers

celebrate their love, Zerbinetta claims that she was right 
all along, and in this way do the two parts of Richard Strauss’s 
opera mesh tidily, a development not lost on Barbara and Sue 
and Fabio and me as we make our way to a neighborhood 
restaurant and are soon tearing into the basket of bread 

our server has brought us that is so good—just salty enough, 
crunchy on the edges, fluffy on the inside—that we ask for
a second basket as our first courses arrive, which are 
themselves so tasty that it is some minutes before we notice
that the new bread is really old bread, that the server

first brought a batch fresh from the oven and then trotted
out yesterday’s bread for round two, a tactic that, yeah,
disappoints the four of us, though not so much that
it keeps us from agreeing that, if we were restaurateurs,
we’d do the same and in this way follow a path

diametrically opposite to that of Our Savior, he whose mom says 
to him at a wedding reception, "They have no wine," 
to which the Son of Man replies, "Woman, what concern 
is that to you and me?” Ignoring the fact that he has 
just called her “woman,” Mary says to the servants, 

"Do whatever he tells you," whereupon the Only 
Begotten Son, ignoring the fact that his mother has 
decided to ignore him a second time and go ahead 
with the miracle anyway, orders the servants to fill jars 
with water, draw out some, and take it to the chief steward, 

who takes a sip and says to the bridegroom, "Everyone 
serves the good wine first, and then the inferior wine 
after the guests have become drunk. But you have kept 
the good wine until now." Jesus: the ultimate bartender. 
No wonder so many people buy the rest of his message.

 

David Kirby teaches at Florida State University, where he has won five University Teaching Awards. He is the author of Little Richard: The Birth of Rock ‘n’ Roll, which was named one of Booklist’s Top 10 Black History Non-Fiction Books of 2010. His latest books are a poetry collection called Help Me, Information and a textbook modestly entitled The Knowledge: Where Poems Come From and How to Write Them. Entertainment Weekly has called Kirby’s poetry one of “5 Reasons to Live,” and in 2016, Kirby received a Lifetime Achievement Award from Florida Humanities, which called him “a literary treasure of our state.”

ISSN 2472-338X
© 2023